This Might Be The Most Ridiculous Attack on Ecigs You’ve Ever Heard

Over the past few years, we have heard a lot of strange arguments against electronic cigarettes, but this week, Dr. Stanton Glantz might have topped them all. As a big activist for tobacco control, Glantz has repeatedly bashed ecigarettes and provided constant criticism of the vaping industry. We’ve heard him make a lot of outlandish statements about ecigs, but this week he made a claim that really took us by surprise. He alleges that vapers are endangering smokers because the sight of someone vaping causes a smoker to crave a cigarette. Basically, he thinks if you vape, you will cause a smoker to light up a cigarette and indirectly be responsible for an increased health risk to the general public.

Glantz justified his position by citing a study from the University of Chicago that looked at how young adult smokers reacted to visual cues. Researchers found that when a smoker saw someone use an ecig, they had an increased desire to smoke a cigarette. So based on this theory, Glantz argued that ecigs are damaging even for smokers.

If you take a closer look at the research, there is no mention of other visual cues that trigger cravings among smokers. However, in order to have a better understanding of the impact of vaping on a smoker’s psychological state, we need to know more about reactions from other cues. For instance, many smokers crave cigarettes after a meal, in the car, or while talking on the phone. Others enjoy a smoke while sipping their morning coffee. How powerful are cues like coffee cups, phones, steering wheels, and dinner plates? As a former smoker, I can say that sipping coffee is a much stronger trigger than watching someone vape. Does that mean that coffee is inherently dangerous because it tempts smokers to light up? Of course not! But then again, Glantz isn’t trying to outlaw coffee. His target is the electronic cigarette.

Although this latest outburst is pretty far-fetched, it’s really not surprising when you look at previous statements from Glantz. He is famous for making bold claims using twisted facts and unsubstantiated research. In fact, his typical scientific process is to make a hypothesis and then dig around until he finds enough related research to piece together “proof” to back his claims. There is no objectivity involved and he has no interest in learning truth. His research is purposeful and invested in solely proving his own opinions as true.

We can trace his bogus claims back to 2008 when he published a study to prove that secondhand smoke causes breast cancer. He never actually did any scientific research, but he combined outdated research linking smoking to lung cancer and paired with it recent data about breast cancer. By making a few vague correlations, he made the case that exposure to secondhand smoke could lead to subsequent breast cancer.

It didn’t take long for Glantz’s study to be completely debunked. We now know it was just junk science after the International Journal of Epidemiology published contradictory evidence in the Oxford University Press. After studying more than 200,000 women over a span of three and a half years, researchers concluded, “The incidence of breast cancer is similar in women who did and did not report passive exposure to tobacco smoke”.

Even with his breast cancer claims debunked, Glantz went on to release further studies. Just a few months ago, we saw his bogus research appear in JAMA Pediatrics. This time, he argued that ecigs were causing kids to start smoking. He selected data from the National Youth Tobacco Survey of 2011 and 2012 to justify his position. However, his theory was illogical and his supporting evidence was full of holes. If he really wanted to prove that kind of theory, he would need to follow vaping adolescents for at least a few years to determine how many (if any) went on to become smokers.

If you follow the logic of Stanton Glantz, then you can prove just about anything to be true. However, his most recent allegation that vaping is harmful to smokers is downright ludicrous. What will it take for Glantz to stop this madness?

Get Our Updates & Giveaways Monthly
  • All the E-cigarette Headlines You Need to Know.
  • Awesome Giveaways Every Month.
Author Focus: Katie Bercham
Katie actually had a negative first experience of electronic cigarettes, picking up a cheap and horrible model from my local mall. Thanks to a chance meeting with co-editor David, she hasn’t had a tobacco cigarette in over 2 years. She brings a strong female voice to the e-cig community... Read Full Profile >
  • Andrew Imrie

    we should ban food cos all smokers want a fag after food, right?

  • AlpineNewt

    When I smoked the biggest trigger was the NRT ads on TV. I notice that Mad Stan is not trying to get those banned!

  • Threthny

    Creepy guy, time for him to hang up his ANTZ shoes before he costs more lives.

  • SOS

    He might be getting fired soon. Pfizer has lost too much income this year and might partner up with AUSTRAILIA instead of USA.

  • SOS

    Great article! Such a strange little man.

  • Zillatron

    I guess by now even the densest so-called journalist and pigheaded politician should start to notice the frothing at the excremental orifice he calls mouth. I’m pretty sure his friends from the pharmafia have some nice pills to quiet him down. In a nice padded room.

  • Ray Yeates

    Vape Safe! Vape Loud! Cranky old guys like me with facts and dignity we
    finally mustered up to set these parasites that gourge on our weakness
    straight. The issue is not going to go away as long as I’m alive at
    least. They had ample time to do the research. They wasted it on
    spending TSET funds and don’t want to lose all that potential cash they
    had planned on continuing from the next generation. Health Care? Hell
    it is. It’s the carelessness that is going to keep exposing the lies
    and deception . The public is not as naive as they would like them to
    be. there is far more important issues in the social structure they
    believe they created for the masses than targeting the smoker…once
    again. My family, children, my friends and many others who have been
    witness to smoking and it’s affects already know about death and harm
    reduction. The donations to Cancer and lung associations is about to
    change……The trust in regulators is gone. The deceptions are very
    clear to millions now and the list is growing. This is not going to go
    away. The more they lie, the more they have to lie to cover last lie.
    It’s a failed attempt and we cannot be shamed any further. 6,000,000
    million lives every 12 months worldwide will end if they control and tax
    this device to death. It’s a friggin battery and simply heats the same
    nicotine they sell over the counter as a stop smoking aid. They don’t
    work. That’s fact over 30 years. Chantix and Zyban has already caused
    532 deaths. Nicotine has caused only one over a 100 year span and it
    was a suicide by injection. Facts. 5 year olds pick Tobacco in the
    exploited developing countries. Fact! FDA can play dumb…..but they
    know they fxxked up by waiting til Big Tobacco buyouts were completed.
    Back to the real motive of protecting the TSET money. Sister Pharma
    paved the road to save her $35 billion a year Band Aid products and
    drugs! Too late….as we say here in Nova Scotia…………. “Jigs
    Up”! . Vape Safe! Vape Loud!

  • Ms. Waters

    What planet does this man live on? Refusing point blank to look at the evidence. He obviously enjoys all the publicity no matter what.